Kommentare zu: jsjac++ http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/ coding and stuff Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:49:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 Von: Nathan http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-127191 Nathan Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:00:05 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-127191 I'm using JabberHTTPBind and JSJac 1.2.2. I can't get it to open a chat session at all. In Firefox I get this error: An error occured: Code: 503 Type: cancel Condition: service-unavailable In IE I get this error: An error occured: Code: 500 Type: wait Condition: internal-server-error And Tomcat's log is saying this: [2] sending response [390275]: Set the 'to' attribute of stream element to the domain part of the user's JID. Example: to='gmail.com'. I'm also getting a lot of these: [Fatal Error] :1:290: The element type "doc" must be terminated by the matching end-tag "". I've used the full email and just the first part (i.e. gogo@gmail.com and gogo) and neither work. Any ideas? I’m using JabberHTTPBind and JSJac 1.2.2. I can’t get it to open a chat session at all.

In Firefox I get this error:
An error occured:
Code: 503
Type: cancel
Condition: service-unavailable

In IE I get this error:
An error occured:
Code: 500
Type: wait
Condition: internal-server-error

And Tomcat’s log is saying this:
[2] sending response [390275]: Set the ‘to’ attribute of stream element to the domain part of the user’s JID. Example: to=’gmail.com’.

I’m also getting a lot of these:
[Fatal Error] :1:290: The element type “doc” must be terminated by the matching end-tag “”.

I’ve used the full email and just the first part (i.e. gogo@gmail.com and gogo) and neither work.

Any ideas?

]]> Von: Mark http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125351 Mark Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:47:20 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125351 Yes, we are talking about the same thing. Yes, we are talking about the same thing.

]]> Von: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125347 Steve Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:33:44 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125347 Mark, sorry for asking again, I wasn't clear enough in first place: Are you talking about the Alternative Script Syntax as outlined by http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html#script or about transmitting JSON encode payloads as seen in example 6 at http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html#stanzas ? Mark, sorry for asking again, I wasn’t clear enough in first place: Are you talking about the Alternative Script Syntax as outlined by http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html#script or about transmitting JSON encode payloads as seen in example 6 at http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html#stanzas ?

]]> Von: Mark http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125341 Mark Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:51:38 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125341 I am talking about the optional JSON syntax of BOSH. Is it possible? I am talking about the optional JSON syntax of BOSH.
Is it possible?

]]> Von: Ben http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125329 Ben Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:12:12 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125329 Mark, you may want to have a look at yaws' json code for a fairly well working json implementation. Running ejabberd and yaws simultaneously might be tricky though, but you could simly take the json module as a starting point. Mark, you may want to have a look at yaws’ json code for a fairly well working json implementation. Running ejabberd and yaws simultaneously might be tricky though, but you could simly take the json module as a starting point.

]]> Von: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125313 Steve Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:38:24 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-125313 Mark, if you're talking about "a GET request" you are not talking about the optional JSON syntax of BOSH (formerly known as HTTP Binding), are you? It's more about additional requests which go along side to Jabber and HTTP Binding, is it? If yes (the latter), then there's a problem which arises out of the nature of BOSH: a browser typically is allowed to make 2 concurrent AJAX requests at a maxmimum for the same host and port. BOSH can take up to two concurrent connections. So if you do additional AJAX requests you might run into trouble here. Nevertheless I wouldn't recommend to hack this into the ejabberd http-bind module. If you're using ejabberd2 you could just write your own standalone module which handles such requests. ejabberd2 got a nice pluggable architecture for extending its HTTP capabilities. Have a look at the docs! Mark, if you’re talking about “a GET request” you are not talking about the optional JSON syntax of BOSH (formerly known as HTTP Binding), are you? It’s more about additional requests which go along side to Jabber and HTTP Binding, is it? If yes (the latter), then there’s a problem which arises out of the nature of BOSH: a browser typically is allowed to make 2 concurrent AJAX requests at a maxmimum for the same host and port. BOSH can take up to two concurrent connections. So if you do additional AJAX requests you might run into trouble here.
Nevertheless I wouldn’t recommend to hack this into the ejabberd http-bind module. If you’re using ejabberd2 you could just write your own standalone module which handles such requests. ejabberd2 got a nice pluggable architecture for extending its HTTP capabilities. Have a look at the docs!

]]> Von: Mark http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-124988 Mark Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:11:18 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-124988 Hi, Thank you for your previous answer. I have a question regarding your http-bind module. It might not be the place to ask but I couldn't find the right place. I need to extend your http-bind module to support JSON(javascript) syntax. Basically, I need ejabberd to listen to a GET request and reply with JSON syntax which is the same as returning a javascript file. I guess it shouldn't be hard but I'm shooting in the dark. Do you plan to support the JSON syntax in the future? Can you explain the steps I'll need to take to modify your code? Do you know of utf-8 erlang json implementation? Thanks Hi,

Thank you for your previous answer.

I have a question regarding your http-bind module. It might not be the place to ask but I couldn’t find the right place.

I need to extend your http-bind module to support JSON(javascript) syntax.
Basically, I need ejabberd to listen to a GET request and reply with JSON syntax which is the same as returning a javascript file. I guess it shouldn’t be hard but I’m shooting in the dark.

Do you plan to support the JSON syntax in the future?

Can you explain the steps I’ll need to take to modify your code?

Do you know of utf-8 erlang json implementation?

Thanks

]]> Von: Matt Ahl http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-123967 Matt Ahl Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:35:46 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-123967 Thanks for the quick turnaround on this! I integrated this change and it worked well. Thanks for the quick turnaround on this! I integrated this change and it worked well.

]]> Von: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-123907 Steve Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:10:07 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-123907 Should be fixed in SVN now Should be fixed in SVN now

]]> Von: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-123817 Steve Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:27:47 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/01/03/jsjac/#comment-123817 Hi Matt, thanks a lot for this detailed report. Great job! I'll try to fix this ASAP. Hi Matt, thanks a lot for this detailed report. Great job! I’ll try to fix this ASAP.

]]>