Comments on: JabberHTTPBind 1.1.1 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/ coding and stuff Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:39:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-224213 Steve Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:54:38 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-224213 Maty, besides I don't know <em>ConcurrentHashMap</em> I'm pretty sure there isn't :) Maty, besides I don’t know ConcurrentHashMap I’m pretty sure there isn’t :)

]]> By: Maty http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-224144 Maty Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:11:52 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-224144 Speaking of concurrency and clocking threads, is there a special reason why not to use <i>ConcurrentHashMap</i> instead of <i>Hashtable</i> for storing the sessions? Speaking of concurrency and clocking threads, is there a special reason why not to use ConcurrentHashMap instead of Hashtable for storing the sessions?

]]> By: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-223788 Steve Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:11:44 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-223788 Madhuri, I'm very sorry, I still haven't fixed this issue. Unfortunately I'm still very busy with other things ("all work and no play ..."). I'll do my best to fix this ASAP. Cheers, -Steve Madhuri, I’m very sorry, I still haven’t fixed this issue. Unfortunately I’m still very busy with other things (”all work and no play …”). I’ll do my best to fix this ASAP.
Cheers, -Steve

]]> By: Madhuri Patwardhan http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-223777 Madhuri Patwardhan Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:11:57 +0000 http://zeank.in-berlin.de/2008/06/25/jabberhttpbind-111/#comment-223777 Hi Steve, This was the last correspondence we had about a bug in JabberHttpBind, in March 2008. ****************************************************************** # Steve Kommentar by Steve | 2008/04/23 at 10:44:23 Madhuri, you’re totally right, this is a bug. Access to session objects needs to be synchronized at this point. Guess I’ll have to rework this… (explains some strange behavior I’ve been noticing) ******************************************************************* Any update on session object synchronization? I would appreciate if you could let me know status of this one. Thanks, Madhuri Hi Steve,

This was the last correspondence we had about a bug in JabberHttpBind, in March 2008.

******************************************************************
#
Steve Kommentar by Steve | 2008/04/23 at 10:44:23

Madhuri, you’re totally right, this is a bug. Access to session objects needs to be synchronized at this point. Guess I’ll have to rework this… (explains some strange behavior I’ve been noticing)

*******************************************************************

Any update on session object synchronization? I would appreciate if you could let me know status of this one.

Thanks,
Madhuri

]]>