Comments on: xmpp and microblogging - let’s do it! http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/ coding and stuff Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:54:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222557 Steve Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:16:21 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222557 kael, thanks for the pointers. I'll setup a wiki today to collect all of this informations regarding microblogging. And yes of course you're right, there are clients that support some PEP based stuff. I should have been clearer here. I meant some sort of microblogging based on PEP. As there's no official standard yet (see stpeter's post) there are no clients supporting it. kael, thanks for the pointers. I’ll setup a wiki today to collect all of this informations regarding microblogging.
And yes of course you’re right, there are clients that support some PEP based stuff. I should have been clearer here. I meant some sort of microblogging based on PEP. As there’s no official standard yet (see stpeter’s post) there are no clients supporting it.

]]> By: kael http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222556 kael Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:40:42 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222556 The proto-XEPs <a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/communities.html" rel="nofollow">Communities</a> or <a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/distributedmuc.html" rel="nofollow">Distributed MUC</a> could perhaps be used for distributed/decentralised microblogging maybe using a Pubsub format. Wondering if the <a href="http://www.cestari.info/2008/6/19/atom-pubsub-module-for-ejabberd" rel="nofollow">Ejabberd-AtomPub module</a> could help as it allows mapping with AtomPub repositories and simultaneous publication over HTTP and XMPP, and provides a REST API. You wrote <i>"there are no PEP aware clients out there yet"</i>, but unless I'm missing something, several clients support PEP like Psi, Gajim or Tkabber (and, I think, Coccinella). This looks like a good and concrete initiative, anyway. Gotta test your code. The proto-XEPs Communities or Distributed MUC could perhaps be used for distributed/decentralised microblogging maybe using a Pubsub format.

Wondering if the Ejabberd-AtomPub module could help as it allows mapping with AtomPub repositories and simultaneous publication over HTTP and XMPP, and provides a REST API.

You wrote “there are no PEP aware clients out there yet”, but unless I’m missing something, several clients support PEP like Psi, Gajim or Tkabber (and, I think, Coccinella).

This looks like a good and concrete initiative, anyway. Gotta test your code.

]]> By: Dr. Azrael Tod http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222555 Dr. Azrael Tod Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:17:20 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222555 another idea i was waiting for since all these microblogging-fanatics popped out everywhere. xmpp is just perfect for this kind of use! Its so sad there are so less clients implementing PEP and Pubsub right... and i dont even start to talk about serverside. -.- another idea i was waiting for since all these microblogging-fanatics popped out everywhere.
xmpp is just perfect for this kind of use! Its so sad there are so less clients implementing PEP and Pubsub right… and i dont even start to talk about serverside. -.-

]]> By: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222554 Steve Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:27:20 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222554 No sorry, it's http://twitter.com/zeank (mostly german ...) for the time being ;) No sorry, it’s http://twitter.com/zeank (mostly german …) for the time being ;)

]]> By: stpeter http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222553 stpeter Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:42:42 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222553 I'm happy to update the xmpp microblogging proposal and get the XSF to publish it when the next XMPP Council convenes. BTW are you on identi.ca/laconica? I’m happy to update the xmpp microblogging proposal and get the XSF to publish it when the next XMPP Council convenes. BTW are you on identi.ca/laconica?

]]> By: Steve http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222546 Steve Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:45:44 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222546 Oh. Actually there's no difference. I called it a contact, XMPP doesn't know of which type it's items of a roster are. I could also have called it an entity. The service will/should be implemented as a component (i.e. service), though it might look/act like a bot (having a jid of foo@tweets.example.com - to not confuse users). Oh. Actually there’s no difference. I called it a contact, XMPP doesn’t know of which type it’s items of a roster are. I could also have called it an entity. The service will/should be implemented as a component (i.e. service), though it might look/act like a bot (having a jid of foo@tweets.example.com - to not confuse users).

]]> By: Lech Karol Pawłaszek http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222545 Lech Karol Pawłaszek Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:26:10 +0000 http://blog.jwchat.org/2008/09/09/xmpp-and-microblogging-lets-do-it/#comment-222545 Why it is to be added as a contact not as a service? Just curious. Why it is to be added as a contact not as a service? Just curious.

]]>